Kaatje Kraft
Professor
Department of Science, Whatcom Community College

Interviewed by:  Luc Charbonneau, American Geosciences Institute
Interview date:  July 27, 2022
Location:  Microsoft Teams

Usage Information and Disclaimer

Disclaimer text

This transcript may not be quoted, reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part by any means except with the written permission of the American Geosciences Institute (AGI).

This transcript is based on a Microsoft Teams interview deposited at AGI. This interview has been auto-transcribed and edited by the interviewer for clarity, and then further edited by the interviewee. Note that the process of auto-transcribing may have introduced occasional spelling and grammatical errors.

Please bear in mind that: 1) This material is a transcript of the spoken word rather than a literary product; 2) An interview must be read with the awareness that different people's memories about an event will often differ, and that memories can change with time for many reasons including subsequent experiences, interactions with others, and one's feelings about an event.

Preferred citation

In footnotes or endnotes please cite AGI interviews like this:

Interview of Kaatje Kraft by Luc Charbonneau on July 27, 2022, American Geosciences Institute, Alexandria, Virginia USA, https://covid19.americangeosciences.org/data/oral-histories/kaatje-kraft/

Transcript

Kraft:

My name is Kaatje Kraft, although I tend to also use my published name, Kaatje van der Hoeven Kraft is to add to the length of it all. I work at Whatcom Community College, and I am a tenured geology professor.

Charbonneau:

Perfect. How long have you been there?

Kraft:

Since 2014.

Charbonneau:

What are you currently teaching?

Kraft:

We offer an array of introductory geoscience courses. We have intro to Earth science, intro to physical geology, physical geology, which is a major’s version of the intro to physical geology, environmental geology, natural disasters, [and] intro to oceanography. I am sure I am forgetting something, but those are some of the meat and potatoes ones.

Charbonneau:

In March 2020 when the pandemic hit and was at its peak and everything shifted, did you go to fully remote learning?

Kraft:

We are on the quarter system. March 2020 was toward the end of our winter quarter, the last two weeks of the quarter. We had to suddenly pivot to everything being online. That was sort of a little wonky because it was sort of had been traditional sort of face-to-face classes and then essentially suddenly everything was online.

So that was a bit of a mess. Faculty had the option of just ending the quarter, rather than continuing online to just end it if they wanted to and give students the grades that they had at that point. They gave us a lot of flexibility in that period.

I remember that I was of course thinking like: “Oh, but anytime now we will go back to everything being normal.” Then they gave us an extra week over spring break between our winter and spring quarters when typically, we only get one week. We got two weeks to prepare for being fully online, and they asked us to be fully online but asynchronous because a lot of our students did not necessarily have access to computers or the internet. [They] just were not prepared to be able to take classes online. [They] just did not have the infrastructure.

A lot of them were managing a home [and] work. A lot of our students are the kind of students that were suddenly now the essential workers in our society that suddenly shifted to everybody being home and ordering groceries and food being delivered.

Our student hours suddenly became much less predictable as well. So, they asked for everything to be asynchronous. We had to recreate courses from scratch to be asynchronous online courses.

Charbonneau:

When you went online, how long was it before you returned to the classroom? When did students start having the option to come back in person to take courses?

Kraft:

I am in the science and engineering department, so I am not in the geology department because [I am] the only full-time faculty member in the geology program. My program is part of a department. When you ask about department, do you mean geology program specifically or the larger department that I am in?

Charbonneau:

For you specifically, when did you have students able to come back into the classroom?

Kraft:

We first started offering opportunities for students to come back into the classroom in the fall of 2020.

Is that right? No, it was this past fall. So, fall of 2021. Time is suddenly very wonky in the age of a pandemic.

Charbonneau:

No worries. Do you normally do laboratory sections and field work for geology?

Kraft:

All our classes are fully integrated in terms of lecture and lab are all integrated together. There is not like a separate lab section from a lecture course. A lot of our face-to-face classes have been hybrids. A lot of lecture type material has been done online and then coming together to kind of do more of sort of that traditional lab activity, engaging activity sort of stuff.

We have been doing field trips and we started having the opportunity for students to optionally meet with us as early as winter of 2021. It was not required, so students still had online alternatives. But if they wanted to meet with us in the field, they had to transport themselves. But we did do sort of field stuff in a face-to-face context.

Charbonneau:

What were you using to like to post your content or what programs are you using?

Kraft:

Our LMS was Canvas. Then of course there are other resources to support that like YouTube and things like that, but the main thing was Canvas.

Charbonneau:

Are you still offering a remote or blended learning model for students or is it all back to being fully in person the way it was before?

Kraft:

We are totally blended. The natural disasters class that I ended up creating as an asynchronous online class has become incredibly popular with our students and fills up every quarter.

We are really struggling with this idea that students are saying that they want face to face or [the] administrations pushing hard for us to have fully face to face. But what they are signing up for first is our fully online classes. Then our sort of hybrid blended [or] partially online, partially in person, are then filling up next. The fully face to face ones are really struggling to fill. While we are trying to offer some of those, I had to cancel a fully face to face class because we only had seven students sign up for it.

Charbonneau:

For your courses that are blended what is the ratio of how often students are coming in person versus being online for those?

Kraft:

It tends to be that they come in about once a week, either for two or three hours, depending on the class and the instructor.

Charbonneau:

When you come back in the fall, what are the COVID restrictions that are going to be in place? Do students have to wear masks? Is there a social distancing?

Kraft:

Those are great questions. We are still waiting to hear from the administration. Assuming it was the same as the spring, there really were no restrictions other than students are required to attest to having been vaccinated. They do not need to provide proof of vaccination, but they need to attest that they are vaccinated. All faculty, staff, all employees of the college are required to be vaccinated.

That is, it. I mean I know personally I have asked students [and] I have requested that they wear masks in the classroom, but I am not allowed to require it.

Charbonneau:

What level of virtual integration have you incorporated into your instruction and teaching? What virtual programs are you using for communication or have incorporated into your instructional design?

Kraft:

I have both in-person office hours and Zoom office hours, so I provide both options. I do have an assignment where students are required to meet with me one-on-one. I now have that as partially in-person, partially virtual, so students can choose depending on the day of the week or whether I will be on campus or not.

Even if I am on campus, you can still choose to Zoom with me instead. It is like that. Providing both options. So, I am more of a blended approach to some of those required one-on-one meetings.

I have in all my classes now; I now have recordings of all the lecture videos. Now pretty much I do not lecture in my class. I give them the opportunity to ask questions and talk through the content that they, in theory, are supposed to go through before we meet for the in-person class. Then we start engaging in the activities for the class itself. I have been pushing more of that flipped modeled classroom.

I have also a lot of alternatives now. If students are sick or something else comes up and they cannot come to class, they can do an all-online lab alternative, they can do an online field trip alternative. So, a lot of additional resources and supplements that are all online were not created before the pandemic.

Charbonneau:

What strategies have you used to recruit and retain students and kind of help push them to that finish line?

Kraft:

It is a good question, and it is one that I do not know if I have a great answer for, in that sort of recruitment and recruitment aspects of students tends to fall to sort of other departments at the college because it is not something we necessarily do at the department level.

In terms of retention, we were getting the message from the administration that it was important to be flexible. That is something that certainly I have worked hard on with my colleagues, and we have talked about sort of what does it mean to be flexible, how do we accommodate students to have more options, and being able to be more flexible with the realities that they are facing? So, that is some of the discussion.

For me personally, I have ended up eliminating penalties for late submissions. While there are still deadlines for things, students do not need to produce an excuse for why they cannot hand something in on time. If they cannot get it in on time, then they still need to do it. But they can do it later.

Which sometimes [helps] them, but for some students it becomes a bigger challenge. This is one of those things I am really struggling with in terms of how much flexibility is too much flexibility. But again, these are kinds of conversations that are happening at the discipline level, at the department level, [and] at the college level.

In terms of other aspects of retention, there has been a lot of efforts to do support for faculty in terms of professional growth, in terms of how to use LMS more effectively, how to design courses more effectively, how to engage students, you know good pedagogy, but also shifting to that conversation of what does that mean for online pedagogy? Certainly, in the wake of George Floyd killing, there is a lot more discussions around what do we mean by equity? How do we make sure that our curriculum has more equitable practices?

But also thinking about how we diversify our curriculum. How do we start thinking about different approaches to thinking about the racist structures that exist within how we teach or what we are teaching? Those certainly also come into play in terms of talking about what we mean by retention and who we are retaining and how do we make sure that we support those students that are staying?

One of the greatest concerns at that institutional level is that the people we lost the most are our students of color and those with disabilities. As a faculty at a community college, where our primary mission is to be an open enrollment institution, we are failing in that regard. So, that is something that has been troubling.

The pandemic certainly contributed to it. It became just one more thing that, in our institution, has not really done a great job in bringing them back.

Charbonneau:

Are you having professional developments, weekly, or monthly meetings where you are seeing some of those things implemented or is that something you expect to see in the future?

Kraft:

Early in the pandemic there was a there was some great support structures in place. They reassigned some faculty to become support for Canvas. There was one assigned to each division. Within the STEM division, we had a person that was our go to person. If we had questions, she held weekly office hours where sometimes we would all just gather and zoom, just because it was a chance to kind of see other people when we were all kind of working in isolation, but it was also a chance to learn tips and learn what other people were doing.

There was a lot of support early on. There was some support over the summer for helping us shift to more hybrid classes when they were between the summer of 2020 and the summer 2021. You could get paid to show up to office hours over the summer to start developing your class as a hybrid class, recognizing that hybrid is different than online. All these different pivots.

There were some support structures in place and professional development around that. Like I said, we had our instructional designer kind of produce a model of sort of surviving. Like how do you just survive being online, striving to do better, thriving? The idea of a step model through lenses of, you know, just general organizational structure, through equity structures, through disability, [and] resource services. Multiple different lenses and thinking about all those different ways that you can really support your structure, your students, through the way that you structure your course.

They did kind of one on ones. We had faculty workshops throughout the year to support faculty. There were many different professional developments happening to support faculty through some of those different transitions.

We went from one support person per division to then one person. Now I do not even know if that person has that position. There is no longer a point person to support you with Canvas. This general expectation is you are now competent in Canvas; therefore, we do not support you anymore. They are always the IT support that has existed prior, but it is understaffed.

For students they did shift to suddenly having an online one room check in. If you had questions about anything, you just go to the one Zoom room and there would be different people there from different departments, like financial aid, enrollment registration, and advising to be able to handle a student’s question and then they would put them into a breakout room. The same thing we have, a student support tutoring center. They are the same thing, a Zoom room where somebody could show up and say: “I need help with this” and there will be a bunch of tutors waiting around to help anybody that showed up.

Then they just put them into a breakout room with somebody else. They tried to minimize it, but there was still that barrier of do I know how to use Zoom, do I feel comfortable using Zoom? That was a bigger challenge. But yes, they did try to minimize the number of places people needed to go [and that] students needed to go to be able to ask questions and get support.

Charbonneau:

Did you see that people were leaving the institution because of the pandemic? Did the number of staff and faculty stay consistent throughout? What did you see change in terms of numbers?

Kraft:

I think in terms of faculty things overall were steady. I think part of that is faculty do not necessarily have as many options in terms of moving elsewhere. You are a bit more places bound. Of course, once you start teaching online then that starts to shift a little. Although, we are now having serious enrollment declines and so we are starting to see faculty lose their positions.

The staff we have had a lot of staff turnover, although I do not know if that was necessarily pandemic related so much as that the weaknesses, cracks, and challenges that exist within our institution started to really reveal themselves during the pandemic.

Staff have a lot of other options. They have skill sets that allow them to be employed in other places and many of them chose to go to some of those other places. I feel like that some of that is a little bit more a function of some of the internal politics that are happening on our own campus. But it was because the pandemic revealed some of those issues more acutely.

Charbonneau:

What about your departmental budget for this upcoming school year? Have you noticed that your budget has changed?

Kraft:

That is one thing that we are struggling with is that now that we do offer online courses that we did not offer before. We have a little bit more of a need for support staff in helping us with lab kits [and] preparation for some of these online classes that we did not need before the pandemic.

Certainly, because our budget is very much tied to student enrollment, we are seeing cuts in budgets. We keep pushing for getting better support for student workers, and the institution has not really been supporting that need. So, we have been struggling with that in terms of getting enough.

So far, we have been successful in making that work. We have been doing some creative ways of making that work that I do not know if they are sustainable over a long time.

Charbonneau:

What did you notice were the skill gaps or knowledge loss that students had due to the pandemic?

Kraft:

I guess to a certain extent I would push back a little bit on that statement just in the sense that it is not so much that there were students who were not learning some of the same things they would have been learning before. They were not developing some of the skills they would have been learning before, but they were then learning new things that they would not have learned previously, and skills that they did not necessarily get pushed on before were now developing.

It is sort of one of those things where students started to get better at, for those students that were successful now, that is a big caveat, because there a lot of students that just were not successful dropped out.

That is one of our greatest challenges is we have just lost a huge number of students to the pandemic that may never come back. But for those that persisted, they learned a lot about how to manage their time and how to be able to work effectively in spaces that are not necessarily really being able to be more.

I have asked students what skills they think they have developed and which ones they think that they would like to be able to work on, and it shifted during the pandemic toward the things that they felt like they worked. They were getting better at time management, better at being creative because they had to come up with solutions when they were not able to get into immediate response from me when they are working asynchronously. They are working at 11:00 at night, and I am answering their questions at 7:00 in the morning.

Now it is that idea of teamwork and working collaboratively are the things that they were really missing during the pandemic that they now are trying to get to rebuild some of those skills. Loneliness was really a big variable. Not being able to have peers to interact with. It is sort of that they are recognizing the value of being back in the classroom with that idea that they are learning how to interact with other humans, that they lost a little bit and the value of that, that that helps them learn. But with that then also comes the challenge of not necessarily doing what is best for them.

I do think that certainly there is something to be said for the how well they are comprehending the content is a little bit harder to gauge. My assessment methods are still tapping into what they are learning, and I see a wide range of that learning. It is harder to get a sense of, damn I do not know, more of a gut sense, which I recognize is not an assessment method.

Like when students have questions when you are in the classroom, it is easier to have some of that back and forth to grab a manipulatable and be able to like to help them further deepen their understanding. Whereas when a student has a question online, I can answer it, but I do not know how well they are then comprehending my response. It is enough for them to be able to move forward in the curriculum, but is it getting that same level of comprehension? And that is a piece that I do not think my assessment is effective enough to be able to really gauge, but I get more of that gut sense when I am with them one-on-one. I do not get that as much of a sense when it is asynchronous online.

Charbonneau:

Now that you are having students return to the classroom, some blended, some online, what are you doing to address this teamwork and these communication skills you want to help facilitate them grow?

Kraft:

Certainly, it is a lot easier in the classroom. Anytime you have an opportunity where you are meeting with students in some capacity, whether it is even in some sort of asynchronous online space, then you can have students talking to each other engaging with each other.

In the online asynchronous I have tried to do things where I have a modified jigsaw activity. Students are assigned a particular topic. So, like the flood topic, each student is assigned a particular flood and six students are assigned to one flood type. Then they must read or listen to a passage. Then there is a Wiki page that they co-edit. Each person “arrives at the room,” it is done asynchronously because it is an asynchronous class, answers one question, and the next question kind of builds on the previous one. The idea is that they are creating a page that then their peers will look at and be able to understand to help them answer other follow up questions about all the flood types, not just the one that they studied specifically. That is sort of one of my ways of trying to get them to have a collaborative sense, even though it is done asynchronously.

It is interesting that when I first started doing it, that approach, students hated that. They were not huge fans of it. They are like: “Oh, I would have to wait around for other people,” and part of it is that now I have learned some of my messaging has changed to make sure students’ kind of understand they need some patience, and that different people are going to work at different paces. The most recent time that I did it was the first time I really had a lot of students say: “Oh this really felt like I was collaborating with other students,” so it is sort of the students who are choosing now to be online rather than be in a face to face environment are finding that those types of opportunities are more appreciated than they were back when students had no choices, if that makes sense.

So, it is sort of that like trying to find ways to get students to collaborate, even in an asynchronous world is tricky. It is much easier when they are in a face-to-face. In face to face, I am regularly active with doing things like course-based undergraduate research experiences to get them to engage in collaborative team-based experiences.

Charbonneau:

What are the professional skills you try to have obtain upon completing your program?

Kraft:

Because we are in a transferring situation, we do not really have a geoscience degree. We do get geoscience majors, but the only classes they really need to take for that major are two geology classes with us. One of which we only offer once every other year. So, most of the classes they are taking are all the other the math, the chemistry, physics, all those other sorts of intro level classes.

One of the biggest things is trying to keep them engaged in just remembering why they are interested in geosciences. Some of that is trying to make sure that I invite former students back to attend field trips that I am running with another class that particularly during the pandemic, they did not get a chance to do that face to face. Then they can serve in at a capacity and help them keep their pulse on the geoscience world while they are taking all those other prerequisites. I recognize that it is not necessarily a larger skill set, but it is one of my motivations to help them maintain motivation, which I think is critical and being able to persist through the degree path.

I think some of the things we really try to emphasize are field based skills, observation versus interpretation. Collecting, interpreting, and reading maps, some of the basic geoscience skills. But some of those social skills are also critical. Effective communication-they get both from our courses but also from their broader coursework that they take as well.

Being able to work in teams, but part of that by bringing them back as in sort of a TA capacity also gives them sort of some leadership skills as well as the ability to sort of effectively take complex information and convey that. So, like thinking about their science communication skills, how do you take complex information and convey it to an audience that is a non-expert. Which is also why I am a huge fan of doing the course based undergraduate research experiences. Those are things I try to make sure get done in those major's classes.

That gives them more experience of being able to read scientific literature. Being able to collect data, being able to effectively communicate it, working in teams, all those sorts of both soft skills and geoscience specific skills, they managed to touch on all those things.

Charbonneau:

What kind of changes did you make to help students complete the courses they need to complete?

Kraft:

I think the biggest caveat was that they allowed us to run some classes with small numbers so that we could still offer those classes that they needed for their major degree pathway. But we did not necessarily provide alternatives or other options.

When we had two weeks remaining in the quarter, they said if you want to end at 10 weeks instead of 12 weeks, you could do that. I do not think anybody I know who was teaching majors did that though. That was more for people that were sort of teaching some of the humanities classes and where maybe it was sort of students had to write a final paper, but if they already written at least another paper, they were sort of like, that is good enough kind of thing.

Charbonneau:

Have there have there been any changes to the requirements for students to complete your program or have those requirements all stayed the same?

Kraft:

Everything stayed the same.

Charbonneau:

Were you doing any of your own research at the time or do you currently do work or your own research?

Kraft:

I do. It is not an expectation of my job. It is sort of one of those I do for fun or masochism, depending on the day. I had an NSF grant that started that was funded in October of 2019, so pretty much right before the pandemic. We did not start it until the winter of 2020 instead of when we really started to take off with the grant. Then everything went to hell in a handbasket quickly.

Managing a grant through the pandemic has been a little tricky. Although you know in some ways it was part of the grant was a faculty learning community and having that learning community through the pandemic. These courses are based on undergraduate research experiences and supporting faculty were developing CUREs for their own courses. So, a lot of faculties were putting off what their plans were because they did not want to do it while they were teaching online. So, it delayed some of that, but it also helped us have opportunities to build the community more deeply.

It gave us suddenly the idea of meeting on Zoom became a lot more palatable. I had been using Zoom for a long time before the pandemic, just because I had been collaborating with people across the country. But for a lot of our faculty, that was sort of something new to them. So, being able to suddenly have more flexibility in meeting, it was easier to find meeting times during the pandemic. Now it is harder because everybody is much busier and has more restrictions in their class schedules and things like that. There have been some advantages and disadvantages in trying to do that work through the pandemic.

I do not know if I would say I had extra time because of course I was busy recreating my courses for different modalities. When I was thinking about it, people were talking about how they suddenly had all the time to make bread or whatever. I was like, who are these people? I do not have time for that!

The grant and the research are all around people cause my research is geoscience education as opposed to geology specifically that made it so that people were more available, which was kind of the upside of that sort of aspect of the grant. But yes, other aspects of implementation were much harder.

Charbonneau:

This strategy you mentioned of utilizing Zoom meetings to make it easier to connect with people. Do you see that will remain in play?

Kraft:

Our administration is pushing back on that a little bit because they want to try and require everybody to be on our campus. But personally, if I am going to run a meeting, I am planning to try to always be able to offer some form of a hybrid option. We have already had some meetings where we have had in person, some people in person, and some people on Zoom, Zooming into the meeting. There are spaces on campus for smaller meetings where that works well.

It will be interesting to try and do something like that. In which case I might just do it as a Zoom meeting, even though we are on campus. I do not know. It is one of those things I need to figure out moving forward. But I do think that it makes it easier for people in terms of balancing their work life balance to be able to still have a little bit more flexibility with their work and their life.

Charbonneau:

What new opportunities did you see that became available to you during the pandemic that you did not have before?

Kraft:

I read that question and I have been thinking about it. From a research standpoint, I do not know if I can identify any just because it has been hard converting all my classes. I have now converted all my classes from fully face to face to fully online, asynchronous, to partially asynchronous, to synchronous online, to hybrid.

I have now basically created every modality with the classes that I offer. That aspect has been exhausting and very time-consuming. From the standpoint of that, the pandemic has afforded me the opportunity to create more modalities which allows me to be more flexible for my students. I think it has been a big benefit to come out of the pandemic.

I had a student in my oceanography class this last spring who had some health issues at the beginning of the quarter, so she could not come to class. So, I was able to give her alternative online assignments. She was in class one day and then end up having a death in the family and had to go to Hawaii for the rest of the quarter and she still passed the class because I had all these online alternatives because I already created them, [which] gave me that flexibility to allow her to still be successful in the class.

It was a lot of work. I am not going to lie, right? But I feel like that is the future in some ways of education, and students will have a greater expectation for greater flexibility. The fact that I have those resources now available makes it easier to be able to create those opportunities for my students.

But from a research standpoint, I do not think I was that deeply impacted. Again, my research is a secondary thing, not the primary thing I do. It is not that I did not create more opportunity. I did create more work for myself through research, but it was not necessarily because of or despite the pandemic, it just kept rolling along.

People would e-mail [and] reach out to me and say: “Hey, do you are you interested in being involved in this or me reaching out to somebody else?” and say: “Hey, I have this idea, do you want to get involved in this?”

One of the most recent grants I just recently received was because GSA was held in person, I was there in person, and I ended up having an impromptu conversation with a colleague that then ultimately led to a grant. That is one of those things that we missed during the pandemic. In theory, that could have identified things that I missed because I did not get to have some of those informal [get togethers], some of those conferences that ended up being entirely online.

But it is not like I would have had time for them anyway, because I was already dealing with other grants. It is hard to say what I might have missed, but I do not know if I could specifically say there is anything that came out of it because of that.

Going back to what you talked about in terms of mental health, there is also a lot to be said for many students who have struggled with mental health. That was one of the most challenging pieces of being in the pandemic and being home working from home alone and seeing students emotionally struggling, having mental health breakdowns and issues, and really getting a sense of that and feeling just so helpless about it. Then you are home alone, and you do not have that ability to process it with your peers and step into the office of somebody and say: “Hey, can you talk to the student?” That was really a challenge and so we have lost students because of that. Not coming back both because of economic decisions and I think also mental health decisions.

Charbonneau:

What piece of advice would you give yourself or somebody entering a similar field of work to you?

Kraft:

Give yourself grace. This is hard work, and it is not going to all happen at once. If you are giving your students grace while you give yourself grace and recognizing that means that you may not necessarily do all the things you wanted to do right away, but that is ok. It does not all need to happen right away.

Ask for help. Find a support network. Use resources where they are available to make sure that you make the most of your peer network.

Charbonneau:

What is your biggest take away for when you encounter obstacles in the future in how you would handle or address them?

Kraft:

I think flexibility being ready to sort of pivot, oh the magical word pivot. Just being ready to be flexible. What are the most important things and what can you let go of? I am going to think that sort of one of those big takeaways are prioritizing.